Belief of Hinduism – Sakar Upaasna (Idol worship)
By Khurshid Imam
***********************************************
Introduction
Idol worship or sakar
upaasna is one of the most
important features of our Hindu brethren. Only aryasamajis are strictly against idol worship.
They don’t do idol worship because it is against the teachings of Vedas. Except for aryasamajis almost all sects of Hinduism believe
and practice it. However, when it is asked to them – does God have any shape or
color or figure? Then the reply is “NO”. Then why you do idol worship? The
reply is – “See, Almighty God is nirakar (without any shape), but we can not
concentrate on someone who is shapeless so we need sakar (a shape) medium in order to reach
that nirakar. We will
reach that nirakar God using sakar medium”. This is the most common
argument in favor of sakar
upaasna or idol worship.
Why people do idol worship?
Even though every logical and just person will agree that
idol worship is not correct yet our Hindu brethren give an excuse for doing the
same. They say – “See, God is actually formless. God can not be seen by anyone.
But it becomes very difficult to concentrate on that imageless God. How can a
layman concentrate on formless God? So we say that for people in the initial level
of devotion should do idol worship; so that through a sakar (with shape) medium
he can reach nirakar (without shape) God.”
No person till now has reached to almighty god using a
shape or image.
* I am yet to meet any person in my life who has started
with idol worship, then gradually he stops it because he has successfully
acquired the devotion of God and does not require idol for the concentration of
that shapeless God.
* 1 billion Muslim in the world can concentrate on that
God without using idol/shape/picture then why can not our Hindu brethren?
* When a Muslim child as small as 7 years and a Muslim
old man of 70 years can concentrate on that God without using
idol/shape/picture then why can not our Hindu brethren?
* No need to say how strict and uncompromising Muslims
are in terms of God being one and unique.
* Go to any mosque around the globe and you will find
hundreds and thousands of people worshipping almighty God in the form of Namaz
without any need of idol/picture/image. I firmly believe that even our hindu
brethren can concentrate without an image.
* When convinced logically; our Hindu brothers will agree
that YES actually God should be worshipped without image, but Question is HOW?
I will answer later in this article. First, we need to understand why we need
serious introspection about the validity of sakar upaasna.
Idol worship distorted the pure Sanatan dharm
The pure Sanatan dharm that was based on the oneness of God
is lost in multiple gods, multiple images of God. We have lost the pure
religion of God because of the distortion of monotheism. God is one, unique,
without any likeness, without any need. Never ever God taught us to give him
an image. When someone worships an image then he is worshipping anything except
God. Vedas never propagated idol worship. The pure Sanatan or Shashwat dharm is
lost in the distorted concept of God.
Swami vivekanand and many scholars of Hinduism have
spoken against idol worship.
1. Idol worship contradicts Vedic mantr
Worship is for whom? For God! Who will define God?
God himself! Does God define himself in his revealed scripture? YES – this is
the most fundamental part of the revelation. Vedas are considered to be ish-wani or God’s word by hindus. They are considered apaurishya i.e. not humane but divine. Now what
God has said about him? A true hindu should ponder over these mantras and introspect their practice:
* Na
tasya pratima asti yasya namah mahaddashah : “Of him (The God) there is no
image. Remembering him is itself great act” Yajurved 32:3
* God can not be grasped in any direction” Yajurved 32:2
* Sah
akayam: “He is bodiless” Yajurved 40:8
* Andhatm pravishanti ya asambhti
upaste… – “Those who worship asambhuti - they enter into darkness of tamas (part of hell). Those who worship sambhuti – they enter more into darkness of tamas (part of hell)”- Yajurved 40:9
The
Sanskrit word asambhuti when loosely translated into the simple language will refer to Natural things e.g. Sun, air, water, moon, tree,
river, mountain, man, woman, animal.
The
Sanskrit word sambhuti when loosely translated into simple language will refer to man-made things e.g. idol.
The
Sanskrit word “tamas” as per Sayanaacharya – the Vedic Scholar – refers to
one of part of hell which is also described in Shrimadbhagwad Puran.
So yajurved 40:9 tells that those who will do
shirk (Associate partner with Almighty GOD) will enter hell. This is similar to
what Quran says in 4:48; 4:116; 5:72
* “That GOD alone is ONE without any partner.” - Atharv
ved – 13:4:12
* “GOD is the master of all creatures. He is the master
of heavens and the Earth. Except him who do you worship?”- Rigved 10:121:1
* “GOD is the Ruler of living and nonliving worlds. He
is the Lord of mankind and animal kingdom - Except him who do you worship?”
Rigved 10:121:3
* “.. Except the GOD who do we worship and give
offerings?”- Rigved 10:121:5
There are several other references from Vedas which make
very clear that Almighty God is one, alone, unique, without any likeness. He
can not be compared with anything. He is the master of all beings. How it is
possible then that we can create image/shape / picture of God? Does God create
us or we create God?
2. Idol worship contradicts logic and common sense
Even if you leave what scripture says and just think
logically then you will realize that it does not go well for a logical person.
Who made the universe?
Look at the world around you. How big
our earth is; great and huge mountains, immense oceans how big our earth is?
Very big? What is the status of the earth in our galaxy-milky way? Nothing. Earth
is so small that almost negligible in our galaxy. Our galaxy has more than
1000000000000 stars!!! Each star being thousands of times greater than earth!!
How many galaxies are in the universe? More than 100000000000!!!!! So how many
stars? Infinite? How big our universe is? Infinite! And this infinite universe
is continuously expanding!!! No comparison. Who is the creator of this
universe? I? You? Any sadhu-maulana? No No, not at all. It’s the almighty God
who is the creator, sustainer, and planner of this universe. Is that almighty
God someone like me and you? No! Is he someone who needs food to survive? No!
Does he sleeps and get tired? No. Does he have any parent or children of a spouse? No. Then how come we can give him an image or equate him with anything.
He can not have any likeness, no vision can grasp him. He is beyond
comprehension.
Different gods for different people?
How many Gods are there? One. Is there
a separate God for hindus, separate God for Muslims and separate God for
Christians? No. Is there a separate God for people of India, bhutan, America
and japan? No. Then how come we have made hundreds of different gods in
Hinduism? How come we have made separate God for north India and separate God
for south India? How come to different God for Andhra Pradesh, different God for
Tamilnadu and different God for Kerala? How come a separate God for rain,
separate God for wealth, separate God for prosperity? Is not this all wrong?
YES, absolutely these all are wrong beliefs. You know what is one of the
reasons for this? Its idol worship. Once people started giving different images
to God, these images gradually became different gods.
Who makes idol?
People believe that Almighty God is
THE CREATOR who had done many things necessary for our existence. How it is
logical and just that people create idols from their own hands and then worship
it? Idol is created by man; then how come idol becomes superior to man? Can an
idol eat sweet that is offered to it? No! Can an idol remove a fly that sits
over it? No! Can an idol stop someone who brings a stick to hit at it? No! It
does not have the capacity. Then why you worship something that can not do
anything? Leave alone giving life and death, it can not
see/hear/listen/harm/benefit you at all. Don’t you think the only worthy to be
worshipped is almighty God who can really benefit / harm / see/listen to you?
Justification in favor of idol worship
Some people say that through the idol
we are worshipping Almighty God. They give an example of a visiting card. Just like
a visiting card represents your detail, similarly, an idol represents God but
it’s actually not God. Again, this is very bad logic. When you take a visiting
card and then you want to speak to or seek any help from the person concerned
then do you communicate to the person on you speak to visiting card? Obviously, people will laugh if you hold visiting card of Mr. xyz in hand and tell – “O!
xyz. I want to meet you tomorrow at the office. Please bring my Cds. Meet me at 5
O’ Clock”. It’s illogical to do this. What you will do is you will actually go
and talk to Mr. xyz. Similarly when you want to worship God then you will
worship him and not any image or shape or idol or human being. When 1 billion
Muslims can worship God without any image then why can’t others do?
· Some people try to twist it so much
that they will come with absurd arguments. Some will say that there is a great
benefit of idol worship. How? There are various types of waves that emancipates
from idols. When you go to idol you get these waves which are very useful. And
so on….
My question is: even if we suppose that waves come out of
idol, how does it justify that one should worship an idol? Is an idol God? Waves
come not from idol but from all objects – so should we worship everything?
There is no justification for this argument. The wave comes from brick then should
we worship it?
Kaba is NOT worshipped
Here on thing is important to mention.
Some people – knowingly or unknowingly spread the misconception that Muslims
also do idol worship. They say that Muslims worship kaba. This is a gross
misconception on the part of such people. Never ever any Muslim has worshipped
kaba.
Kaba is a
cubical structure at mecca. It represents the direction for namaz (prayer) for Muslims all
over the world. Islam lays great emphasis on unity and discipline. For worship
also great emphasis is on unity and harmony. One can not offer the obligatory
prayer any time he wishes. There are certain times for that. One can not offer
namaz at any place, but people have to gather at the mosque. One can not offer
prayer separately, but all people will stand shoulder to shoulder in rows. All
people will face the same direction. This direction is kaba. All Muslims around
the globe have this common direction of prayer which is a great symbol of unity
and harmony.
3. Idol worship is against human psychology
· Usually our hindu brethren will say
that in order to concentrate on formless God we concentrate on idol or image.
It is as per human psychology that the more you will concentrate on something
more it will be in your mind. The more you look at image or idol and
concentrate over it more it will be embedded into your mind as God.
· The more you look at idol assuming it
to be God, the more you propagate the same, the more you teach the same – more
you will replace God with the idol.
· People usually give the excuse that it’s
only for the beginners that idol is needed for concentration – for the later stage, it’s not required. Again this theory is a lie. Every hindu who believes in idol
worship does throughout his life. Never have we heard that someone has left
idol worship because now he is able to concentrate on God without an idol. Also, other important point is that we can not teach the wrong thing. If the idol is not God
then we can not say idol is God for beginners, but for people in advance, stage
idol is not God.
What is the substitute for idol worship?
The problem expressed by our hindu brethren in
concentrating formless God is actually a genuine problem. It’s really difficult
to concentrate on formless God. This problem is a genuine problem and hence it
has a practical solution – The Salah or Namaz. Namaz is one of the ways to worship God. Every day 5 times a Muslim is supposed to offer namaz.
This problem of concentrating on God is met by the following
solution:
Prophet Muhammad taught us that when you stand for prayer
then you assume that God is seeing you. When a person starts offering namaz
with the belief that God is seeing him then he will be able to fully
concentrate on namaz. He will understand that namaz is a way of communication
with God. The way we offer namaz with full obedience – we should be obedient
even after namaz. One can see 1 billion Muslims around the globe concentrating
on God without any need of image or idol.
Messenger of God or Prophet Not only teaches to worship
God but also teaches how to do so. Namaz is the worshipping of God and it was
taught by all prophets. So namaz was there for every prophet, even for the
prophet who was sent to India. One of the parts of namaz is still prevalent in
Hinduism today – in its distorted version – in the form of sashtang.
Sashatang
One of the modes of worship is sashtang in Hinduism in
which the worshiper lies down on the ground. Unfortunately this sashtang
is done on wrong way. Word sashtang is made up of 3 words: sah + asht + ang i.e
together + 8 + part. Sashtang is the mode of worship in which 8 parts of body
participate. When a person lies down on the ground, his whole part and not only 8
parts – touch ground; so it's not the correct form. The correct form is sajda
in which 8 parts of body touches ground: 2 hands, 2 knees, 2 leg-fingers, 1 forehead, and 1 nose.
To know more about islamic meditation-namaz-click
here:
Conclusion
· Idol worship or sakar upasna is one of
the most important features of Hinduism today.
· People doing so give the excuse that
one can not concentrate at the initial level hence it is required for the concentration. This excuse is against scripture and logic.
· Idol worship contradicts the teachings
of Vedas.
· It contradicts common sense and logic.
· Namaz is the substitute of sakar
upasna where a person can very well concentrate on God without using any image
or idol.
Note: Author Khurshid imam is a software engineer,
Bangalore. For any feedback mail to serviceforhumanity@gmail.com
your comments at the top say hindus always say they need to worship through the form to get to the formless. this is actually not correct. people worship based on nirakar and sakar concept in gita. sakar is god in his form. if bhagwan himself reveals his message then why not worship god in that form. this is so clear in the gita. i am not sure why you guys try to mislead people like this. you may get few converts but when they learn the truth they will drop islam or killed by sharia law for leaving.
ReplyDeleteQuite Vaishnava. I will see to this matter now. Take rest.
Deletebbtw, 2+2 is 4 but so is 5-1=4, 6-2=4 or 16/4=4 etc.... niak has mislead you muslims into darkness.
ReplyDeletedear ishwar das bhai - instead of proving any point wrong in the article u have just made some vague allegations. U mst be clear first what is God's word as epr Hinduism - vedas or Geeta?? if u think Geeta then u have to agree that Ved vyas was not the author of mahabharat. I hope u r well aware that geeta is nothing but converstaion between krishna and arjuna in the battle field of mahabharat. And mahbahrat was an epic written by ved vyas ji.
ReplyDeleteAnother point is - if Geeta contradicts with any vedic teaching then kindly let me know how ur going to resolve this discrepency? Which one si superior?
Also-logically speaking do u really believe that God can be a human being, a sadhu, a maulvi or a suoer man? God is beyond human perceptuion, beyond any likeness.
Last but not least - i believe u r an ISKCON devotee and Parbhu da has himself mentioned time and again to stick to vedas. Understand the intent of the article - if there is ONE god he has to be same for whole of the humanity, we can not have sperate gods, millions gods for different region and locality.
@ishwar das bhai. u said - // 2+2 is 4 but so is 5-1=4, 6-2=4 or 16/4=4 etc.... niak has mislead you muslims into darkness//
ReplyDeleteU r right. we can get result as 2 in several ways. we agree with all such claculations, but we dont agree with wrong calculation. you can not believe 2+2=5 to be true and remain in true path at the same time.
If naik sahb tells u 2+2=4 then will u not believe in it bcz it was told by naik sahab????
Also within hinduism there is aryasamaj who is strictly against idol worship, who does not believe Krishna to be Almighty God, who is against all such beliefs in panthiesm and incarnation of God - how come they arrived at such conclusion with the VEDAS???? Do u agree with their view??
when u consider urself bold, then why close the comment section. come n publish every comment we post. be clear and accept the truth that islam is not final...
ReplyDeleteraj
dear raj bhai
DeleteComment moderation is for uncivilized and abusive people. You will agree with me that many people do not have manner of writing so they need to be tamed. For others - we are bold enough to discuss each and every matter even face to face. Let me know if you are interested.
Humesha yaad rakhna k Jo sahi hota hai uske saber zaada dushman hote hai...Islam sahi hai isliye har religion k log usko oppose karte hai...pagal agar bole k mai pagal nhi hu to wo akalmand nhi hojata..Islam Ko jaano for bolo...Kisi bhi religion k books Mr qayamat ki situations nhi hai but humarr Quran me sab kuch mentioned hai aur additional info haddis me...
ReplyDeleteAre you sure that there is no one who can challenge your friend with correct sources?
DeleteI am Aditya and iam hindu but whatever u said about the theory of god has convinced me upto great extent. Because as for example prophet mohammed, guru nanak, jesus christ and even shirdi sai baba have too told people about oneness of god. That's why he said sabka maalik ek. That means we are worshipping imaginary gods like shiva, vishnu and other different deities. Is it so. Please give ur reply on my email adityanagar93@gmail.com.
ReplyDeleteDear Khurshid Imam,
ReplyDeleteAs a devoted muslim you should not be quoting the references from other holy books other than Quran & old testament, it is forbidden (Qufr). so give the references from Quran Only. Leave Vedas & Geeta to us only.
An for your Idol worship thing since you mentioned you have not met anyone who left the idol worship & then proceeded to worship the formless, bodyless god the answer lies in your post only... Swami Dayanand Of Arya samaj and he was a hindu. and moreover if you dint meet anyone who followed this path then it means you have not tried hard enough & that was because you were busy all the time in preaching your religion by finding the short comings of other cultures & practices.
Now in the last since you have gone against the teaching of Quran by referring from other religion book (Vedas) you have booked a tiny slot of dojhak at the time of judgement day.
Himanshu Sharma
Dear Khurshid,
ReplyDeleteGood Job for such a nice article with lots of research effort. Sometimes it is very hard to digest and even it is not possible for everyone................
ReplyDeleteMr. Khurshid Imam, on multiple instances of the above excerpt from your own blog mentions "Yajurveda x.y.z". Hence, by default I assume you to be a person well versed in Yajurveda. And that means you are very well aware of the fact that there exist two Yajurvedas- Krishna Yajurveda and Shukla Yajurveda. These two are further branched into various Shakhas/Samhitas like Taittiriya and Vajasayeni. So may I know, which Yajurveda, which Shakha/Samhita did you refer to for the verses 32:3, 32:2, 40:8 and 40:9?
Also, can you kindly mention to me the name of publishers/person/organisation who told you that the word 'Tamas' means 'hell' and not 'ignorance'?
Genesis 1:27 that God created Adam in his own form. It clearly shows that God has a form, he has a head, face, nose, eyes, hands and legs, etc. That means God has a form. Only Hindus believe that God is formless, where as Islam and Christianity believes in God with a form. It gi
ReplyDeleteAre you sure? Vedas say that Parabrahman has form:
Delete"sahasraśīrṣā puruṣaḥ sahasrākṣaḥ sahasrapāt |
sabhūmiṃ viśvato vṛtvātyatiṣṭhad daśāṅghulam ||" (Rig Veda 10:90:1)
A THOUSAND heads hath Puruṣa (Parabrahman), a thousand eyes, a thousand feet. On every side pervading earth he fills a space ten fingers wide.
If God is formless, then where from comes His thousand faces, eyes, arms and feet?
"mukhaṃ kimasya kau bāhū kā ūrū pādā ucyete ||
brāhmaṇo.asya mukhamāsīd bāhū rājanyaḥ kṛtaḥ |
ūrūtadasya yad vaiśyaḥ padbhyāṃ śūdro ajāyata ||" (Rig Veda 10:90:11-12)
When they divided Puruṣa how many portions did they make?
What do they call his mouth, his arms? What do they call his thighs and feet? The Brahman (Brahmins) was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rājanya (Kshatriyas) made. His thighs became the Vaiśya, from his feet the Śūdra was produced.
In the above verse, it is clearly indicated that God created humans after His own image, who are divided into four Varnas.
Do us a favour dear; do some homework before openning your mouth. People who have studied Shastras exist, and they will catch your lies in an instant, thus putting you to shame.
Joy Ma!
RigVeda 100.6
ReplyDeletepra visnur astu tavasas taviyan tvesam hy asya sthavirasya nama
Foremost be Visnu, stronger than the strongest: for glorious is his name who lives for ever.
Bhagvad Gita 11:13 - Then and there Arjuna son of Pandu could see the complete universe, variously devided, situated in one place within the Universal form of Lord Krishna the Lord of all lords.
Rig Veda - 10.90.13
The Moon was gendered from his mind, and from his eye the Sun had birth;
Indra and Agni from his mouth were born, and Vāyu from his breath.
Rig Veda 10.93.14 -
pra tad duhsime prthavane vene pra rame vocamasuremaghavatsu
ye yuktvaya panca satasmayu patha visravyesam
This to Duḥśīma Pṛthavāna have I sung, to Vena, Rama, to the nobles, and the King.
They yoked five hundred, and their love of us was famed upon their way.
Chandogya Upanishada 3.17- Krishnaya Devakiputra
Rig Veda 8.74.3,4-
3 Here Kṛṣṇa is invoking you, O Aśvins, Lords of ample wealth.
To drink the savoury Soma juice.
4 List, Heroes, to the singer's call, the call of Kṛṣṇa lauding you,
Yajurveda 32:4 -
This very God pervadeth all the regions. yea, born aforetime,
in the womb he dwelleth.
He verily born and to be born hereafter meeteth his offspring,
facing all directions.
Markandeya Purana, Devi Mahatmyah 1:50-51 - When the great Lord Vishnu entered in to his yogic slumber on the bed of Sesha, the great snake which was lying over the single ocean (the earth and sea transformed thus at the end of the world (deluge)), out of the ear wax of Vishnu two famous and terrible Asuras called Madhu and Kaidabha rose with an intention of troubling Brahma.
May I know the purpose of your reply to my comment?
DeleteRig Veda,purusha suktam 2-3- The Lord of the universe, Lives inside the universe, And without being born, Appears in many forms,And only the wise realize his real form…”
ReplyDeleteYajurveda 32:3 na tasya pratima asti yasya nAma mahad yasah this is full sentence -
There is no likeness to him; he is unique; there are no 'measures' or 'scales' that limit him.
Brihadaranyaka Upanishd 2.5.19 - The Lord, takes on manifold form.
Sama Veda Chp2 de3 Hymn 3- Indra, as one with mighty arm, gather for us with thy right hand
Manifold and nutritious spoil!
Sama Veda Chp2 de3 Hymn 4- Praise, even as he is known, with song Indra the guardian of the kine,
The Son of Truth, Lord of the brave.
Bhagvad Gita 11:15 - Arjuna said O Lord, I behold within your body all the demo gods also all diverse species of living entities, all the Devine sages and serpents , Siva Brahma
Rig Veda 2:23:1 OM Gananam Tva Ganapatim
Rig Veda 1.164.31 - I saw a Gopala (Gopa). He never falls from his position; sometimes he is near, and sometimes far, wandering on various paths. He is a friend, decorated with a variety of clothes. He comes again and again to the material world.”
Bhagavad Gita 15:15 - And, I am seated in the hearts of all;
from Me are memory, knowledge, as well as theirabsence. I am verily that which has to be known by all the Vedas;
I am indeed the author of the Vedanta, and the knower of the Vedas am I.
Yajurveda 3:13 - You two will I invoke, O Indra-Agni, will please you both
together with oblation.
Givers, you twain, of vigorous strength and riches, you
twain do I invoke for gain of vigour.
You're student of Zakir Naik I know lol
ReplyDelete